Research Reports
How AI Answers UK Workwear Buyers: Who Gets Named, and What Gets Cited
We asked ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews 8 UK workwear buyer questions every day. Who they name, what they cite, and what that means.
Two markets that share no customers, no regulators and no competitors, read side by side.
Both studies check what AI engines say about a business against the business’s own answers. Answers of “Unknown” count as no answer.
| Engine | Checks | Right | Partly right | No specific answer | Wrong |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 2,175 | 69.9% | 5.3% | 21.9% | 2.8% |
| Perplexity | 2,151 | 50.6% | 20.3% | 20.6% | 8.5% |
| Gemini | 1,873 | 27.9% | 3.0% | 65.3% | 3.7% |
| All three | 6,199 | 50.5% | 9.8% | 34.6% | 5.0% |
Two brands fact-checked in this sector, 18 May to 22 October 2026. Answers of “Unknown” count as no answer, and a policy link that differs only by “www.” or a trailing slash counts as right.
In workwear, AI often declines to give a specific fact (35% of checks) and is wrong about 5% of the time. Gemini declines most.
Banking: all 1,272 banking fact-checks came from one bank’s account, so they describe that bank, not the sector. AI gave no wrong email addresses; the only errors were an outdated phone number and a dead link, both in February and March 2026, and neither appeared from May.
A uniform buyer has buying guides, comparison blogs and forum threads to read. A bank customer mostly has the bank’s own pages for rates and terms. That difference shows up in what AI cites. The two studies covered different windows and our citation capture changed in late August 2026, so read the levels as a contrast, not a precise comparison.
The takeaway: AI visibility depends on the category. Track your own buyers’ questions before borrowing numbers from someone else’s.
SiteSignal checks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews for you and turns the gaps into a weekly to-do list.
No credit card needed.